BAD GOVERNANCE UNDER THE DUTERTE ADMINISTRATION
TERRIFYING
ANTITERROR BILL
Philippine
Daily Inquirer
05:00
AM March 03, 2020
…unwarranted surveillance and intimidation
of ordinary citizens…Senate Bill No. 1083, the proposed “Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020’’ that the
Senate, voting 19-2, approved last week?
The
bill pushes for the vast expansion of the state’s coercive power to frightening
lengths. It authorizes, for example, the surveillance
or wiretapping of individuals or organizations for 60 days, with a “non-extendible period of 30 days.’’
Telcos and internet service providers will be compelled to turn over a
suspected person’s call, text and internet metadata to authorities.
The
bill does exempt from wiretapping journalists and their sources, as well as
lawyers and clients, doctors and patients, and confidential business
correspondence. But that is small comfort knowing how authorities can very well
weaponize existing laws to target anyone it perceives as a government enemy.
Under
the bill, “terrorism” is said to be committed by any person within or outside
the Philippines who, regardless of the stage of execution, engages in acts
intended to cause death or serious injury or danger to the life of any person,
extensive damage or destruction to a government or public or private facility,
extensive interference with, damage or destruction to critical infrastructure;
or who develops, manufactures, possesses, acquires, transports, supplies or
uses weapons of mass destruction to intimidate the public, create an atmosphere
of fear and intimidate or destabilize the government. These acts are punishable
with life in jail.
Sen.
Francis Pangilinan, who voted against the bill with Sen. Risa Hontiveros, said
the “too vague and encompassing’’
definition of terrorism would allow erring law enforcers to use even common
crimes to “frame’’ individuals. Compounding that danger, law enforcers are now absolved
from punishment for wrongfully detaining citizens, as the bill repeals the
hefty deterrent penalty of P500,000 per day of wrongful detention under the
present law.
The
period of detention without warrant of
arrest has itself been extended from
the current three days to 14 days, with a bonus 10-day extension. Given the country’s corruption-prone and
inefficient justice system, think of the miracles of injustice that can happen
to an innocent person detained without charges and under the mercy of
authorities for 24 days.
Sen.
Panfilo Lacson, principal author of the bill, gave assurances that the measure
provides adequate safeguards against abuse. Instead of just a trial court, authority
from the Court of Appeals will be required for surveillance and proscription.
Also, authorities must immediately notify a nearby judge and the Commission on
Human Rights about any arrests. There are also jail penalties for erring law
enforcers.
Unfortunately,
this bill, a similar version of which is pending in the House, cannot be taken
in a vacuum. Far from showing that it is a government of laws, the Duterte administration has, in fact, engaged in what observers see as “lawfare” to go after critical and
independent voices — from opposition figures jailed or charged with
sedition, to activists, NGOs and church groups red-tagged and media entities harassed on top of the police’s well-documented record of
planting evidence and summarily executing suspects.
Senate
Bill No. 1083 directly degrades civil and political rights and augments the
powers of the government to weaponize and abuse the law in its program to silence legitimate
political opposition. The bill erodes the already dangerously diminished freedoms
of speech, of association, and of the press presently, and the government accountability
and transparency that they critically foster. This law directly detracts from
good governance.
Eroding
civil and political rights also works to degrade the following aspects of good
governance, regulatory quality and the rule of law—because intrinsically
linked to the advancement of civil and political rights is the promotion of economic
rights that naturally develop the market economy and stimulate wealth creation
by the private sector. When civil and political rights are degraded, the opposite
deleterious economic effects take place: inefficient, predatory government, corruption,
plunder, and cronyism—all familiar to us, it is the anti-developmental legacy of repressive,
criminal, and exploitative regimes in the Philippines.
Photo courtesy of Paweł Zdziarski
ReplyDeletePhoto link:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Surveillance_video_cameras,_Gdynia.jpeg
Gonzalinho