IS SPIRITUAL DIRECTION NECESSARY?
“‘The
first thing that we could say about a spiritual director is that everybody
needs one,’ Johnson said.
“It’s
a point on which not everyone in the world of spiritual direction and formation
completely agrees.”
—Mary
Farrow, “Spiritual direction: What is it, who needs it, and why?” Catholic News Agency, January 1, 2019
I
strongly disagree with Johnson, and as the article itself notes, some would
agree with my view.
The
Ethiopian eunuch certainly benefited spiritually from the counsel of the
apostle Philip. At this point I would ask—is every priest or spiritual
counselor the apostle Philip?
Bad,
I would even say, very bad spiritual
directors abound.
Here
is what I believe is necessary for every pilgrim in the spiritual life:
-
Live according to the law of God
-
Love God and grow in the love of God
To
the extent that spiritual direction fosters growth in this direction, it is
well advised. But a personal spiritual director isn’t necessary. You can live
according to God’s law and love God fervently without a personal spiritual
director.
However,
you cannot live this way without the guidance and teaching of the Roman
Catholic Church, which is available through means other than a personal
spiritual director.
The
lives of many saints show that spiritual direction is not necessary to attain holiness
pleasing to God.
Spiritual
direction, like any exercise of religious and spiritual authority, can be and is abused. A priest, even a priest
trained in spiritual direction, is not necessarily the best source of
assistance for the pilgrim in the spiritual life.
Spiritual
direction, generally speaking, is to some extent incompetent to deal with
psychological and psychiatric problems, because although the latter intersect with
spiritual problems, they are separable. Psychological and psychiatric problems
require appropriate professional help. Sometimes, the spiritual director is
incapable of providing that help.
We
should not act contrary to our conscience. To do so is always morally wrong,
even if in any one particular case our conscience might be wrong. Saved by our
conscience, we are also damned by our conscience. If a spiritual director
compels you to act against your conscience, he or she is simply wrong,
according to this principle.
We
should give the counsel of a spiritual director its due. Only after doing so should
we act, but always according to the judgment of our conscience.
We
should understand the role spiritual direction plays in the spiritual life and apply
the appropriate criteria when engaging it.
The
path of the spiritual life is a rocky road, not easily navigated. The best
advice I would give in traveling this dangerous way is to depend on God over
and above everything else.
Don’t depend on a spiritual
director.
SPIRITUAL DIRECTION IN
OPUS DEI
A spiritual director today is not going to get by
on traditional Roman Catholic spirituality alone. A psychology background
sufficient to recognize problems and refer someone properly is necessary.
“People who seek a spiritual guide or companion
expect psychological insight or at least a lived awareness of human dynamics.
The need for fundamental knowledge of human psychology is based on Christian
incarnation, which assumes that God works in and through the ordinary processes
of human growth and development. …the director should be able to recognize some
of the typical symptoms of psychological or emotional disorder, disability, or
disease. There should be some minimal recognition of the distinctly different
developmental processes and psychological dynamics between men and women.
Finally, it is of the utmost importance…for the director to have the humility
and knowledge to recommend that emotionally troubled directees seek
professional clinical intervention rather than using pop psychology to handle
their problems.”—Frank J. Houdek, S.J., Guided
by the Spirit: A Jesuit Perspective on Spiritual Direction (1996), page 137
Opus Dei directors have zero background in clinical
psychology, as a rule. They rely on medieval Thomistic psychology—unscientific,
in some important respects simplistic—which ignores the major advances in
scientific clinical psychology and is besides primitive and inadequate to vital
clinical applications today.
Supervision, experience, and maturity—the latter
comes with age—of the spiritual director is also necessary for them to be
effective. Much harm—lifelong damage even—can be done by youthful, immature
spiritual directors who depend on their theoretical understanding, sometimes inadequate—due
to obstacles imposed against accessing relevant scientific or theological
knowledge, or for whatever reason—without any or sufficient grounding in
practical applications, which is to say, reality.
“Some spiritual fathers are likely to be a hindrance
and harm rather than a help to…souls…. Such directors have neither
understanding nor experience of these ways. They are like the builders of the
Tower of Babel [Gen. 11:1-9]. When these builders were supposed to provide the
proper materials for the project, they brought entirely different supplies
because they failed to understand the language. And thus nothing was
accomplished.”—Saint John of the Cross, The
Ascent of Mount Carmel, Prologue, 4
The above problems can be significantly avoided by appropriate
supervision, which over some years should lead an inexperienced spiritual
director to acquire adequate, if imperfect, competence.
Although relevant theological knowledge is
necessary in spiritual direction, interestingly, in the opinion of Saint Teresa
of Avila, it is not absolutely so.
“It is very important that the master [spiritual
director] have prudence—I mean that he have good judgment—and experience; if
besides these he has learning, so much the better. But if one cannot find there
three qualifications together, the first two are more important since men with
a background in studies can be sought out and consulted when there is need. I
say that if these learned men do not practice prayer their learning is of
little help….”—Saint Teresa of Avila, The
Book of Her Life, Chapter 13, 16
I would underscore that if a director lacks
relevant theological knowledge—human beings are limited, after all, in their
capacity for knowledge—then it should be sought out by the directee from the
proper sources.
Often enough Opus Dei is obstructed in the task of
spiritual direction because its primary agenda is not to help people
spiritually but to propagate itself. The organization relies on a self-serving
distillation of historical Roman Catholic spirituality—something that suits the
objective of propagating the organization but that clearly does not address the
spiritual needs of many because it is narrow in scope and deficient in
understanding.
Photo free for commercial use, no attribution required
ReplyDeletePhoto link:
https://pixabay.com/photos/horse-horse-rocking-chair-2748556/
Gonzalinho