FREEDOM OF THE PRESS CHECKS THE ABUSE OF POWER
TRUTH AND THE TENANT OF MALACAÑANG
By Rina Jimenez-David
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:28 AM February 23, 2018
No, Harry Roque, what your President and his official family have done
to Pia Ranada (and her boss, Maria Ressa) of Rappler is not just like being “a
home owner who wants a rude visitor out of his home.”
First, as outspoken actress Agot Isidro observed: He does not own his
present home, he is just renting it. And renting it only because the real
owners expect him to vacate it after six years, and not do anything to disgrace
the home and its storied legacy.
But clearly, the President, his relatives and his official family
really do look on Malacañang as their own private enclave, what with private
parties being held in the PSG compound across the Pasig River (still considered
part of the Palace complex), and his granddaughter using the premises as the
backdrop to her predebut photo shoot, including using the presidential seal as
a prop.
The President resides in Malacañang only because his public position
entitles him to it, and because the Palace itself stands for the state, which
is why almost all the all-important state rites, ceremonies, celebrations and
occasions are held there. Other presidents have chosen to live elsewhere—Cory
Aquino in the Arlegui Guest House, Erap in the executive quarters nearby—but
they all held office in Malacañang.
But Malacañang has always been considered the “house of the people,”
even if security concerns necessarily limit public access to its grounds (as
President Erap learned when he toyed with his populist promise to open the
gates of Malacañang to the masses, and had to deal with an expectant, then
angry, mob).
So in place of the people at large, authorities have let their
“representatives” enter Malacañang during important occasions. These
representatives include actual elected officials, Cabinet members, friends and
members of the officials’ social circle, chosen invitees, and—most important of
all—the media.
Members of the media—especially reporters who regularly cover the
presidential beat and thus belong to the Malacañang Press Corps—enter the
presidential residence not just as journalists, correspondents or bloggers, but
also as representatives of the Filipino people. They are there to ask questions
of officials in behalf of the masang Pinoy, and then convey the officials’
replies and explanations to the same audience.
Being inside Malacañang is not just a right of every reporter and
legitimate news organization, it is their civic duty, and it is incumbent upon
officials, especially those charged with the executive’s communications arm, to
facilitate this process. Not stand in the way of the reporters’ access to
officials and gloat at the hardships they face as they struggle to get at the
truth behind the latest controversy, or hack away at the weeds of fake news and
alternative facts that choke the path toward an accurate and full rendering of
the truth.
And, yes, part of the reporter’s work is to do everything she or he
must to get past the lies, deceptions, dodging, and denials that officials
employ. If she has to be grating, confrontational, annoying, or aggressive in
the process, then she’s just doing her job, as would someone like Harry Roque
be doing his when he gets flustered, annoyed, or arrogant.
Roque accuses Ranada, the Rappler reporter at the crux of the entire
controversy, along with everyone in Rappler, of engaging in “fake news,” when
she reported suspicions being raised about the full extent of executive
assistant Bong Go’s interest in the Navy frigate deal. But it must be made
clear that news that question the administration’s views, or raise doubts about
the veracity of the official line, is not peddling fake news. It is in fact an
earnest effort to get at the full “real” truth behind the lies being peddled to
the public.
I find it ironic that Roque and Mocha Uson, the high priestess of fake
news, should now hijack the term “fake news” to attack all other media people
who try to get at the factual actual news. Remember, “you may be entitled to
your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.”
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of
civilisation, it expects what never was and never will be. The functionaries of
every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property
of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people
themselves, nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press
is free and every man able to read, all is safe.”
—Thomas Jefferson, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Retirement Series,
Volume 9: 1 September 1815 to 30 April 1816
“It is the press, above all, which wages a positively fanatical and
slanderous struggle, tearing down everything which can be regarded as a support
of national independence, cultural elevation, and the economic independence of
the nation.”
—Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
“All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the
press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, to buy and
fake ‘public opinion’ for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.”
—Vladimir Lenin, Revolution!: Sayings of Vladimir Lenin
I was the first murder victim under Marcos’ martial law regime.
I will not be the last casualty of political repression.
What was my crime?
I exercised my freedom of speech and expression.
They were guaranteed under our constitution.
I exercised my freedom of the press.
Associate editor of Hasik,
our university student publication,
I wrote articles like “The Vietnamization of the Philippines,”
“Democracy Is Dead in the Philippines Under Martial Law.”
The year I died I was 23 years old, about to graduate with honors from Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila.
Image labeled free to share and use
ReplyDeleteImage link:
https://trofire.com/2016/07/11/u-s-number-41-freedom-press-thom-hartmann-program/
Gonzalinho
A DANGEROUS TIME
ReplyDeleteBy: John Nery - @jnery_newsstand
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:07 AM October 30, 2018
…Holding the government and other powers that be to account is not abuse of press freedom, but rather the very definition of it. The freedom of the press is best understood as part of the constitutional order of checks and balances, for the democratic project to survive. It is meant precisely to inform the public from which a government derives its mandate and its authority, and thus the public agenda that can help shape the policy agenda.
…Press freedom is not a privilege in a democratic state; it is an inalienable right, guaranteed by our Constitution, and ennobled by the sacrifices of our heroes. The Constitution is clear. Article III — a set of provisions known collectively as the “Bill of Rights,” not the Bill of Privileges — Section 4 uses language that goes back to the 1935 Constitution: “No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.”
… Duterte resorts to the easy populism that lies behind the idea that media institutions have overused and abused press freedom.
Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/117097/a-dangerous-time#ixzz5lVWmVXWC
Gonzalinho
In a democracy, we should be free to speak against, criticize, and challenge authority. Without that, how can we hold our leaders accountable?
ReplyDelete#DefendPressFreedom
GretchenHo, @gretchenho
Philippine Daily Inquirer (April 1, 2019)
Gonzalinho
I am f—ing SICK of this mentality—so popular in the PH—that in order to criticize the government you have to be pure/decent. Why do Duterte’s critics have to be held to impossible standards when he gets a pass for being a racist misogynist who brags about killing people?
ReplyDelete@leonsabraso
Philippine Daily Inquirer (April 4, 2019)
Gonzalinho
Lee Kuan Yew’s oft quoted statement that the problem with the Philippines is that it has too much freedom was mentioned again in the Ateneo forum on media freedom. It’s not what we have but what we don’t have that’s our problem—and that is our lack of honest and competent leadership.
ReplyDeleteLuis V. Teodoro, @luisteodoro
Philippine Daily Inquirer
May 2, 2019
Gonzalinho
VITAL, VIGILANT JOURNALISM
ReplyDeletePhilippine Daily Inquirer / 04:06 AM September 28, 2020
…The weaponization of social media for the benefit of powerful political interests is why journalism has become even more vital and relevant today.
In an age where all sorts of information are at people’s fingertips, the work of journalists has become way more daunting but essential, a constant fight to shine the light of truth against those who have the motive and the means to suppress it.
…It is the job of journalists and media workers to sift through the clutter of misinformation and confusion—even contend with the lack of information, deliberate or otherwise — to provide the people the essential information they need to keep themselves safe, to know what their government is doing (or not doing) to stem the spread of the pandemic, to ensure that taxpayer money is being spent judiciously and transparently on their behalf, to bring their urgent stories to the attention of those in power.
…Today, journalists around the world celebrate World News Day — an occasion, said the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers or WAN-IFRA, that “aims to raise public awareness of the critical role that journalists play in providing credible and reliable news, to help people make sense of — and improve — the rapidly changing world around them.’’
Indeed, journalists doing courageous and excellent journalism is just half of the battle. An enlightened citizenry must also do its part — one, by being discerning and critical about information they see and read so that they do not fall prey to the vultures of the inauthentic; and two, by fighting alongside journalists and media workers to defend freedom of speech and freedom of the press at all times, as the core, non-negotiable freedoms of any country that garbs itself as a democracy.
Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/133976/vital-vigilant-journalism#ixzz712Z8N0v7
Freedom of speech and freedom of the press—when they are exercised intelligently and responsibly, with a view to advancing the common good of society—are two among the fundamental bulwarks against tyranny.
Gonzalinho
Fake news is a problem that has assumed the proportions of a Nazi Germany because it places liars, murderers, and thieves in power and calumniates, subverts, and disenfranchises the honest, trustworthy, competent, well-meaning, and upstanding—that is, the very public servants we want and deserve in a genuine democracy.
ReplyDeleteGonzalinho
Why is freedom of speech important?
ReplyDeleteIt battles for the truth
It makes everyone more accountable
Necessary for change and innovation
https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/why-is-freedom-of-speech-important/44136
—Eleanor Brooks, “Why Is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy: 5 Reasons,” Liberties, April 1, 2022
Gonzalinho