People Power Monument (1993) by Eduardo Castrillo |
A NATION FORGETS
EDITORIAL
Heroes and history
Although taking on the dimensions of a rote exercise by now, Malacañang’s issuance of an official statement last Aug. 21 honoring Ninoy Aquino on the 34th year of his assassination and reminding the nation of his heroic place in the people’s fight for freedom, was commendable.
A bit of a surprise, in fact, given the general antipathy that has been
directed at the Aquinos’ legacy by certain forces identified with President
Duterte, who ran and won on a platform of change that promised a radical break
from the conventions of the liberal democracy established after the Aquino-led
People Power revolution of 1986.
But there it was — Mr. Duterte’s signature on words that unreservedly
paid tribute to the opposition figure killed at high noon at the Manila
International Airport tarmac — a brazen act of murder that would mark the
beginning of the end of the Marcos dictatorship.
“Throughout his career,” the statement read, “[Ninoy] fought for what
is right and just. Up until the very end of his life, he inspired a peaceful
revolution that resulted in the liberties we enjoy today… His deeds have taught
us that we should always aspire for the common good — even if one must go
against the grain — and do what is necessary.”
Still, for what was a straightforward act of remembering a great
Filipino’s sacrifice, a major counternarrative was mounted on social media in
an apparent attempt to disparage Aquino’s memory.
A virtual flood of postings, suspicious for the similarity in tone,
advanced a common argument: What exactly had Ninoy done? He was supposedly no
hero, but a troublemaker whose very rabble-rousing forced Ferdinand Marcos to
declare martial law; why even bother to remember him with laudatory words, much
less a holiday? His so-called legacy — freedom and democracy after the toppling
of the dictatorship — made life only worse for the Filipino, hence the
“correction” now being done under the Duterte dispensation.
The abysmal ignorance of that position is one thing; the sheer vitriol
that often accompanied its explication hinted at another methodical, deliberate
campaign to further twist and muddle history, despite the trove of easily
available evidence and testimony attesting to what really happened during the
dark Marcos years.
And this is the worrying part: The revisionism appears to be working
especially on the young, many of whom are wont to unthinkingly pine for a supposed
“golden age” under the Marcos dictatorship — one with no traffic, no crime, no
drug addicts, and no rallies.
The shadowy fabricators of this alternate history appear to have found
their perfect targets — people with no memory at all of the struggles of those
who came before them, whose blood and sacrifice helped rebuild the democratic
space that is used so irresponsibly and sullied so wantonly today.
When Aquilino “Nene” Pimentel Jr., one of the last lions of the freedom
movement, spoke a few days ago against the rash of extrajudicial killings under
Mr. Duterte’s watch, he was likewise mercilessly mocked online, derided as old,
out of touch and ready to be put to pasture.
Disrespecting elderly statesmen in this way reflects an insidious
mindset that can only thrive in an environment of gross historical amnesia —
the same lethal strain of forgetfulness that renders many Filipinos oblivious
to, and unable to care about, the country’s heroic breed: its World War II
veterans and martial law activists, for instance, as well as the men and women
of our time who toil unheralded in the frontiers of social work, education,
agriculture, etc.
But perhaps the Philippines is merely reaping the whirlwind of its own
casual indifference toward learning from its past. The administrations after
Edsa 1986 seem to have failed in teaching history right, and the larger
society, too, must bear part of the blame for forgetting and forgiving too
soon.
That collective memory gap is turning out to be far more dangerous and
consequential than benign forgetfulness; now Philippine history, and its
critical examples of heroism and patriotism, are under assault as well.
FORGIVE, DO NOT HONOR
Supreme injustice
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 12:40 AM December 21, 2016
Last Nov. 8, the Supreme Court decided that former president Ferdinand Marcos deserves to be given the honor of being buried in the hallowed grounds of the Libingan ng mga Bayani on the basis of a policy that allows soldiers to be buried in that cemetery. What could have been a historic opportunity to make a decision upholding human rights and justice turned into an ignominious and supreme injustice to the Filipino people.
Marcos was not an ordinary soldier; he was a tyrannical dictator who
imposed martial law on the Philippines and unleashed a reign of terror for 13
years, leaving on its wake the murder, torture and rape of thousands of
Filipinos who resisted the dictatorship. His ill-gotten wealth for his family
and friends robbed the Philippine government of billions of pesos and continues
to be the object of investigation and court proceedings here and abroad. By
dismantling the democratic institutions of the country during martial law, he
plunged the country into its lowest political, economic and cultural abyss.
To this day, the Marcos family has neither shown any remorse nor
admitted guilt despite the global condemnation of the massive human rights
violations committed by their patriarch. With arrogance and impunity, they have
initiated a campaign to distort history, reinvent the Marcos years as the
golden years in Philippine history, and declare Marcos as a national hero. In
this project, the Supreme Court has proven to be an effective accomplice.
To honor him as a hero is mocking the thousands of victims who died and
those who were tortured and continue to suffer because they fought and resisted
the dictatorship;
To honor him is to say that the massive human rights violations
committed by the Marcos regime with impunity; the unprecedented plunder of our
country’s resources and the destruction of our democratic institutions never
really happened in our recent history;
To honor him as a hero is to deny that the Filipino people exercising
their sovereign will, ousted the dictatorship for his crimes against the people
during the 1986 People Power Revolution;
Lastly, to honor Marcos is to dishonor the dignity, legitimacy and the
very credibility of the Supreme Court itself as an institution that stands for
fairness and justice.
We urge the nine Supreme Court justices who supported this decision to
reflect on the impact of their decision on the thousands who died and those who
are tortured and are reliving their suffering and to consider the future of the
Supreme Court, whose credibility has been seriously eroded because of this
unjust decision.
As an institution of learning that values VERITAS (truth), peace,
justice and the integrity of creation, we will continue to promote an
enlightened and critical understanding of the struggles of Filipinos against
martial law and the historic redemption of our freedoms and human rights in the
People Power Revolution where Maryknoll / Miriam College was an active
participant.
We promise to promote Philippine history from the prism of those who
struggled to fight for democracy and not from the revisionist version of those
who are now trying to systematically distort and conceal the brutal realities
of the past.
We commit ourselves to always remember and never forget the bitter
lessons of the past so we can continue to build a future for the next
generations based on respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and dignity
of the Filipino people.
PROF. AURORA DE DIOS, executive director, Women and Gender Institute;
DR. JASMIN NARIO-GALACE, executive director, Center for Peace Education; CARLO
GARCIA, executive director, Environmental Studies Institute; NIKAELA CORTEZ,
president, Sanggunian ng mga Mag-aaral ng Miriam
To forgive is not to honor evil. To forgive is not to forget history.
To forgive is not to deny truth.
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:11 AM September 13, 2017
On Monday, while the rest of the nation ignored or mourned the 100th birthday of Ferdinand Marcos, the dictator’s family hosted a celebration at the Libingan ng Mga Bayani.
HUKAYIN!
EDITORIAL
Dishonoring our nation and our heroes
On Monday, while the rest of the nation ignored or mourned the 100th birthday of Ferdinand Marcos, the dictator’s family hosted a celebration at the Libingan ng Mga Bayani.
In a transparent attempt to further the administration-supported,
court-sanctioned rehabilitation of the mastermind of military rule, Imelda
Marcos and her family invited the diplomatic corps as well as high government
officials, even including members of the opposition, to the ceremony.
It was an extraordinary gesture, properly Imeldific in scope of
ambition, and while many did not honor the invitation, it served to make a
point: The Marcoses are not putting closure to the controversy surrounding both
dictator and dictatorship, but rather opening a new, revised chapter in the
country’s history.
That the Marcoses could even attempt this whitewashing — in a cemetery
designated a “national shrine,” bodyguarded by the same Army that Marcos first
politicized and then turned into a weapon against his own people, under the
legal aegis of a Supreme Court decision—gives the lie to the central
rationalization of that unfortunate ruling.
Associate Justice Diosdado Peralta’s majority decision began with an
appeal to closure: “In law, as much as in life, there is need to find closure.
Issues that have lingered and festered for so long and which unnecessarily
divide the people and slow the path to the future have to be interred. To move
on is not to forget the past.”
How wrong the Court was! The ruling did not provide closure to the
Marcos “issue,” because it offered his family and his supporters the
opportunity to begin revising historical record. And the Marcoses, never shy
about opportunities economic or political or legal, have done exactly that.
The Court ruled that the Libingan
ng Mga Bayani was not in fact the national heroes’ cemetery — but ordinary
citizens can read the cemetery’s name and judge for themselves. While the
majority decision busied itself with distinctions like this, the Marcoses and
their supporters lost no time in treating the Libingan the way ordinary Filipinos see it, as the final resting
place for heroes.
How naive the Court was, to think that the Marcoses would not use the
prominence, the significance, of the Libingan
ng Mga Bayani as a means to support their conviction that Marcos was, in
fact, a bayani.
...How cowardly the Court was, to imagine that history was something
remote, something removed from judicial decisions. “There are certain things
that are better left for history — not this Court — to adjudge.
The Court could only do so much in accordance with the clearly
established rules and principles. Beyond that, it is ultimately for the people
themselves, as the sovereign, to decide, a task that may require the better
perspective that the passage of time provides.”
In truth, the Court made history, or created a new vector for it, when
it disregarded settled precedent and current law to arrive at the narrowest
possible justification for allowing the burial of Marcos’ remains at the Libingan. But the Marcoses have proven
themselves to be adept at maximizing the potential of cowardice. If the Court
will leave it to “history” to adjudge Marcos, his family will rush in where cowards
fear to tread.
And that is why we had that sorry spectacle on Monday: honors paid at
the national heroes’ cemetery, for a man whose political career dishonored both
nation and its true heroes.
Photo courtesy of Maki R.
ReplyDeletePhoto link:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EDSA_People_Power_Monument_Creative_Shot.jpg
Gonzalinho
In the era of fake news and historical revisionism, the act of remembering is, itself, a form of rebellion.
ReplyDeletepilo hilbay, @fthilbay
Inquirer.net
November 26, 2018
Gonzalinho
BAYANI
ReplyDeleteLink: https://poetryofgonzalinhodacosta.blogspot.com/2019/02/bayani.html
Gonzalinho
House Bill 7137 declaring Sept 11 as Marcos holiday is a gross disrespect to all victims of the dictator’s atrocities, including the rape survivors under his regime. This legislature (save for the 9 who voted against) will go down in history as traitors to the Filipino people.
ReplyDelete@jeanenriquez
Philippine Daily Inquirer (September 4, 2020)
AN INSULT TO ILOCANOS
By: Solita Callas-Monsod - @inquirerdotnet
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:06 AM September 05, 2020
Our Congress is passing a bill declaring Sept. 11 as President Ferdinand Edralin Marcos Day in Ilocos Norte. And with no debate whatsoever. Words fail me. Do the Germans/Austrians celebrate an Adolf Hitler Day anywhere in Germany, or in Braunau am Inn in Austria? Do the Italians celebrate a Benito Mussolini in Predappio, Italy?
We not only will be the LAUGHINGSTOCK OF THE WORLD, [all capitals mine] which held us in the highest respect when we overthrew the dictator peacefully and became a role model for all other similar movements to follow, including the fall of the Berlin Wall, but we will also have pissed on the face of Ninoy Aquino and all the victims of martial law, as well as on our faces—the victims of Marcos’ plunder—for which we had to suffer for almost 16 years before we could regain our former per capita income.
…Now, about this “he is a hero to Ilocos Norte and to most Ilocanos all over the world”: What is the basis of that statement of Senator Sotto? It actually is an insult to Ilocanos. Are they not Filipinos first? Did they not see the devastation that Marcos brought on the Philippines? Did they not witness how he tried to keep himself in power even after 20 years?
So, the dictator Marcos did a lot for Ilocos while he was president. Does that more than compensate for what evil he wreaked on the Filipino people? The Ilocanos are not dumb. And I am sure they are Filipinos first.
My father was an Ilocano (born in Abra, raised in Sta. Maria, Ilocos Sur) who thought the world of Ferdinand Marcos. He was a journalist with the Philippines Free Press and wrote articles defending the young Marcos who was accused of killing his father’s opponent (Julio Nalundasan). He was struck by Marcos’ brilliance and his potential, and was his personal friend. He chose then Senate President Marcos to be a principal sponsor at my wedding (he came, and charmed me, too).
But when President Marcos declared martial law, my father brought me every day to the Supreme Court to hear the martial law case against Marcos. And I remember him sighing, and saying, “if I knew then that he would do this to the Filipino people, I would never have defended him.”
That’s the kind of Ilocano I know. A Filipino first. And someone who would evaluate Marcos not just on the basis of a few, or even many, scraps thrown his way. And I am half-Ilocano. And proud of it. But I am a Filipino first. As I said, Senator Sotto insults the Ilocanos.
Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/133322/an-insult-to-ilocanos#ixzz6teyuHYuR
When I was 18, I was tortured and imprisoned by Marcos for 4 years because I criticized him for banning student councils. Many Ilocanos were also imprisoned then. We cannot celebrate the birth of a man who imprisoned and tortured Filipinos. This is adding injustice to our pain.
Neri Colmenares,
@ColmenaresPH
Philippine Daily Inquirer (September 7, 2020)
Gonzalinho