Opus Dei—a Fascist Organization?


OPUS DEIA FASCIST ORGANIZATION?

Opus Dei claims that it was “founded by God” on October 2, 1928, a date proximate to the time of introduction of fascism in Spain. In addition, the rise and growth of Opus Dei in Spain parallels Spain’s rapid development during the sixties under the dictator Franco. Not surprisingly, therefore, it is plausible to claim that the fascist ideas circulating from the late twenties of the last century until the year of Franco’s death had a major influence on Saint Josemaria Escriva and that this influence naturally extended to the so-called “spirit” of Opus Dei.

When we closely examine some of Escriva’s ideas about Christian spirituality, their fascist character is very apparent.

begin Fascist Culture

The culture that became embedded in Francoist Spain has been summarised by del Arco Blanco as ‘the disqualification of those who had lost the war (the “reds”), and the negation of everything the Republic had stood for (qualified with the prefix of “anti-”).’ This ‘war culture’ was sustained through myths, symbols, ‘heroes’, ‘martyrs’, commemorations and values, encouraging ‘victory not reconciliation, and punishment rather than forgiveness.’  And importantly, it was here that the Falange was able to make one of its most significant impacts.’ Right up until the 1970s it was the Falange which exerted control over the media and propaganda. This ‘gave the regime an appearance, and Spain a politico-cultural atmosphere, that were ostentatiously “fascist”,’ writes Blinkhorn.

One of the key tools for establishing this culture, already firmly established in Spanish society, was religion – or more specifically Catholicism, the declared state religion under Franco. During the civil war, the Spanish Catholic Church had played an important role in rousing support for the rebels and Francoists – to whom it had given full support – with the bishop of Salamanca, Enrique Pla y Deniel, declaring the Civil War as a ‘crusade for religion, the Fatherland and Christian civilization’ in September 1936.

Spanish Catholicism aimed to instil ‘a way of disciplining the work-force by granting the possibility of redemption through total obedience to authority.’ The Francoist state’s direct association with Catholicism, as opposed to the Republic’s secularism, meant it could attract support from ‘respectable’ Spaniards and seize upon the language and imagery of religion to convey its own legitimacy. end


The above article, “To what extent did Franco impose a ‘Fascist’ state and identity on Spain?” alludes to the fascist attributes of Franco’s regime that, interestingly, also define Opus Dei qua organization—anti-Communism, militarism, triumphal nationalism...mythmaking, censorship, and propaganda under the direction and control of the state...authoritarianism, and anti-liberalism.

Unlike in Germany, Italy, and Japan, fascism in Spain was “successful”—Franco established a stable social and political order after the Spanish Civil War, and under his dictatorial rule Spain attained outstanding economic development. Under these historical conditions, fascist ideas naturally gained widespread currency, building deep foundations in Spanish society, in Opus Dei in particular.

begin Spain differs because while Hitler and Mussolini were utterly defeated, Franco won. “Germans know that they were on the wrong side,” says Javier Cercas, whose million-selling 2001 novel, Soldiers of Salamis, grappled with how Spain remembers its civil war – and whose mass success proved how much the question still burns. “There was no blurring. In Spain, there’s blurring. On German TV you can’t see people saying Hitler was great. You can in Spain,” he says, speaking of a Francoist nostalgia that has not been entirely extinguished. end


The following article identifies the attributes of fascist and quasi-fascist groups in the Roman Catholic Church:


Based on the foregoing article, we apply to Opus Dei the following framework consisting of fascist and quasi-fascist attributes:

- Anti-liberalism
- Anti-Communism
- Religious reaction
- Authoritarianism
- Group superiority complex
- Metaphysical community
- Mythic ideology
- Triumphalism
- Aggression
- Militarism
- Repression
- Recapitulation of fascist motifs, e.g. struggle, “will,” purity, cleansing, etc.
- Corporatism

See: https://oddsandendsgonzalinhodacosta.blogspot.com/2017/11/placeholder.html

Comments

  1. Photo courtesy of Opus Dei Communications Office

    Photo link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/opus-dei/13599124645

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete
  2. On August 7, 2011, I had a strange dream. I was carrying around the severed hand of St. Josemaria Escriva. It started to decay in my hand, turning disgusting black at the fingers and beginning to putrefy. “Get rid of it! Get rid of it!” somebody shouted. I hurried to Escriva’s corpse and dropped it beside his body. Both rapidly decayed. Then I woke up.

    I would guess that the decaying body represents the negative effects of Opus Dei in my life, including my lingering resentment about the experience. Dropping the decaying hand—it was his left hand—beside the body represents my desire to rid myself entirely of these negative effects. In Western culture the left hand generally symbolizes something sinister.

    I believe in this case Escriva’s hand also represents what is sinister, indeed, idolatrous in Opus Dei, and the Roman Catholic Church would do well to divest itself of it.

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete
  3. THE GURU’S CAT

    When the guru sat down to worship each evening
    the ashram cat would
    get in the way and distract the
    worshipers. So he ordered that
    the cat be tied during evening
    worship.

    After the guru died the cat
    continued to be tied during evening
    worship. And when the cat
    expired, another cat was
    brought to the ashram so that it
    could be duly tied during evening
    worship.

    Centuries later learned treatises
    were written by the guru’s scholarly disciples
    on the liturgical significance
    of tying up a cat
    while worship is performed.

    In Anthony de Mello, S.J., The Song of the Bird (1984), page 63

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete
  4. Opus Dei—totalitarian spirituality and a product of a totalitarian period of history

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete
  5. The architectural style and interior design of Opus Dei oratories is neo-Baroque. The Baroque is a European style. It is the style of the Counter-Reformation. It is also the style of the Age of Discovery.

    The Opus Dei style glorifies the European. It glorifies European colonial expansionism. It glorifies European colonialism, and everything bad that goes with it—slavery, for example, as well as racism, chauvinism, the exploitation of the natural resources of enslaved peoples, neo-colonialism, and so on.

    Neo-Baroque was Escriva’s favorite style. It glorifies him.

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete
  6. Private Revelation Does Not Guarantee Truth or Rectitude
    Posted on Amazon.com on September 7, 2000
    Minor editing on original post

    It is more accurate to say that Opus Dei is a mixture of what is good and holy, along with beliefs and practices that are not only questionable but arguably immoral. No one can quarrel, for example, with the value of prayerful devotion or the practice of Christian asceticism. However, the outright deception of parents in the name of the virtue of prudence clearly transgresses the eighth commandment against lying. The practice of taking parents’ possessions and transferring them to the Opus Dei centers without the parents’ knowledge, a practice that during my stay in Opus Dei was encouraged directly in writing by Father Alvaro del Portillo, citing “the example of our holy Founder,” the then deceased Msgr. Josemaria Escriva, also transgresses the seventh commandment against stealing. What are patently immoral practices can only be justified by misguided casuistry.

    The notion that Opus Dei ideology and praxis is entirely the product of divine inspiration is, in my opinion, theologically insupportable. Much of Opus Dei ideology and praxis originates from Blessed Escriva, if we are to believe historical testimony as well as the practice among Opus Dei directors of citing Blessed Escriva to justify what is often called the Opus Dei “spirit.” Yet we must acknowledge that the source of this spirit is Blessed Escriva’s claim to private revelation, which belongs to a very different category of truth from the depositum fidei of the Church. Indeed, in many cases it seems that Opus Dei beliefs and practices, as is evident from Ms. Tapia’s account, may just as well be the product of human judgment, preference, and opinion.

    Father Escriva’s beatification and probable canonization do not alter this equation because the papal act of beatification does not necessarily sanction Blessed Escriva’s claim when he was alive that he, as the Founder of Opus Dei, is the sole source and arbiter of a divinely communicated system of belief and practice. One has only to read the history of the Church and peruse copies of original documents to realize that in notable instances, the saints made mistakes that in the context of current knowledge and modern mores might very well be regarded as disgraceful. Some of the saints’ mystical writings also show them to be recipients of private revelations that turned out to be false.

    Instead of assuming that what has been passed on from Blessed Escriva is divinely inspired in its entirety, I believe that it is a more accurate theology to recognize that the truth and value of private revelation is manifest in its effects: “By their fruits you shall know them” (Matthew 7:20). It goes without saying that systemic aspects of Opus Dei ideology and praxis have had very negative effects on individuals who joined the organization under the impulse of unknowing idealism, including Ms. Tapia.

    Therefore, to cite or criticize the negative aspects of Opus Dei does not necessarily constitute “slander,” an emotionally charged word that tends to obfuscate the issues raised by what may very well be legitimate criticism. Insofar as Ms. Tapia testifies to harmful aspects of Opus Dei that are consistently confirmed by many former members, including myself, she is simply telling the truth.

    To be continued

    ReplyDelete
  7. Private Revelation Does Not Guarantee Truth or Rectitude
    Posted on Amazon.com on September 7, 2000
    Minor editing on original post

    Continued

    I emphatically attest that numerous beliefs and practices of Opus Dei have worked to the harm, at times severely damaging, of many former members, including Ms. Tapia, as well as their families, and that this abuse is insupportably justified by invoking a divine mandate. In consequence, it is my sincere desire that Opus Dei reform itself in specific aspects, for the sake of many aggrieved persons and for the protection of the next generation. Reform entails the rejection of important aspects of Blessed Escriva’s idiosyncratic legacy. I earnestly hope that the little I have written will work toward enlightenment and genuine reform. We should not have to wait as long as Galileo did for rectification.

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete
  8. A very effective way to brainwash your followers is to tell them that thinking for yourself is a sin...

    Also to claim that your words are gold coins dropping from the mouth of God...

    And finally, to propagate thought-stopping clichés that work like antihistamines but only for a time—after which they lose their efficacy.

    Gonzalinho

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment