Saint Thomas Aquinas (c. 1481-82) by Sandro Botticelli |
THE IMPOSED CONSCIENCE
“If
I’m obliged to bring religion into after-dinner toasts.... I shall drink to
conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.” That’s by Blessed Cardinal John
Henry Newman. It’s good that giants of the Church make such bold statements.
They protect lesser mortals from being denounced when the latter think and say
likewise.
Despite
reversals trained at Vatican II, it nonetheless liberated a spirit that can’t
be confined again. It’s the genie out of the bottle, the toothpaste out of the
tube, the runner that got through enemy lines. It’s out and free. It’s the
primacy of conscience.
Vatican
II says that “we are bound to follow our conscience faithfully in all our
activity and no one is `to be forced to act in a manner contrary to one’s
conscience.’” Conscience is “the most secret core and sanctuary of a
person...alone with God whose voice echoes in the depths of the person.”
(McBrien, “Catholicism”)
It’s
not only the voice that whispers what’s right, what’s wrong; it also includes
the entire process of thinking what’s right or not, of deciding to do this and
not that, of even choosing who’s arguing right or wrong. No longer can any
institution’s prescribed conscience “substitute itself for the individual
conscience.”
...Now,
a fashionable phrase is “formed/informed conscience.” The Church has long been
accustomed to lead in this formation, such that up to now, a formed conscience
is one that conforms to the “teachings of the Church,” really an imposed
conscience.
...But
the Church must face it. “Teachings of the Church” are not the normative
criterion, the last word for a formed conscience. By all means, heed the
principles taught by the Church, but an individual’s prudential judgment takes
over in day-to-day applications of the principles, in light of specific and
overall context. One size does not fit all.
The
hierarchic mindset to insist that the “teachings of the Church” are ipso facto
the word of God has to be tempered. The mindset is still sowed earnestly:
“Papal Twitter messages, as with everything written by the Pope, will be part
of the Church’s teachings, but not infallible.” (Inquirer, 12/14/12)
...Thank
God for the temperate voice of Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle: “[B]ishops have to
be clear in their own theological positions. They should be able to present
their case and not just simply use authority, not simply say, ‘This is the
teaching of the Church, therefore you should follow.’” (Inquirer, 11/27/12)
Sifting
the “teachings of the Church” for “musts” and “mays” is only fair, instead of
making all of them seem to be “musts.” Is Church solicitude about concern or control
a means to obedience?
With
the recovery of conscience, will people err, abuse, neglect its formation? Yes,
decidedly, even with the best efforts of many. But that’s the road to
adulthood—rocky. The Church cannot play man-to-man from beginning to end.
Either she loosens her grip or gets shaken off.
However,
there are fundamentalist-inclined Catholics, educated and learned who
wholeheartedly submit to and accept “instructed consciences” when it comes to
all the teachings of the Church. “Where the Church pushes the cart,” there also
do “we push ours.” To each his own.
TRUTH CANNOT BE FORCED
Philippine
Daily Inquirer
11:13
pm | Sunday, January 6th, 2013
Re
Asuncion David Maramba’s “Toast to conscience” (Inquirer, 12/28/12).
Thank
you for another blow in defense of conscience.
“Dignitatis
Humanae” also teaches that “...all human beings are bound to search for the
truth, especially with regard to God and His Church, and as they come to know
it they are bound to adhere to the truth and pay homage to it.” Pope John Paul
II, in “Crossing the Threshold of Hope,” states in the chapter “What is the Use
of Believing,” that human freedom must be taken very seriously.
Man
cannot be forced to accept the truth. He can be drawn toward the truth only by
his own nature, that is, by his own freedom, which commits him to search
sincerely for the truth and, when he finds it, to adhere to it both in his
convictions and in his behavior. (“Crossing the Threshold of Hope”)
His
Holiness further states that this has always been the teaching of the Church...and
is reflected in the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas and John Cardinal Newman!
Amen.
Poch
Robles, strobles@pldtdsl.net
CONSCIENCE...THE VOICE OF GOD LIVING IN US
Fr.
James Keenan, S.J., visiting professor of Theology at the Loyola School of
Theology (LST) lectured to a full house of the Cardinal Sin Center, LST on July
11, 2003. It was the second in his series of lectures, which were held every
Friday in July....
Peter
Lombard and Thomas Aquinas debated about whether one should follow one’s
conscience or follow the Church’s. Peter Lombard says one is not bound to
follow one’s conscience if it goes against the dictates of the Church. More
than a century later, Thomas Aquinas went against Lombard’s position, saying we
should accept excommunication rather than go against our conscience. Fr. Keenan
agrees with Aquinas. He says that going against our conscience is going against
the voice of God. However, Fr. Keenan stresses the point that: “If the church
teaches one thing and we believe something else, we are obliged to know what
exactly the church teaches and whether we still have grounds for disagreement.
Then we ought to know exactly what the disagreement is and how serious it is,
and...why we are convinced that our way of acting is the more obliging way of
loving God and our neighbor than what the church teaches.” In other words, we
can’t just say, we disagree with the Church and do what we want. We have to be
fully informed about what we are disagreeing with. Applied to other moral
issues, we are obliged to find out what is right, to find out everything we can
about the issue so our conscience is as fully informed as possible. Otherwise
our conscience would be ignorant and therefore erroneous.
Source:
“Conscience...the Voice of God Living in Us,” in Magis: Official Publication of
the Magis Deo Community, Volume XV, Number 7 (August 2003), pages 6-7.
I, the Lord, alone probe the mind and test the heart, giving to all according to their ways, according to the fruit of their deeds.—Jeremiah 17:10
***
I, the Lord, alone probe the mind and test the heart, giving to all according to their ways, according to the fruit of their deeds.—Jeremiah 17:10
Images of works of art are posted on this website according to principles of fair use, specifically, they are posted for the purposes of information, education, and especially, contemplation.
ReplyDeleteGonzalinho
Toast: “To the Pope, if you please – still, to Conscience first and to the Pope afterwards.”—John Henry Cardinal Newman
ReplyDelete“Over the pope as expression of the binding claim of ecclesiastical authority, there stands one’s own conscience which must be obeyed before all else, even if necessary against the requirement of ecclesiastical authority. This emphasis on the individual, whose conscience confronts him with a supreme and ultimate tribunal, and one which in the last resort is beyond the claim of external social groups, even the official church, also establishes a principle in opposition to increasing totalitarianism.”—Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
Gonzalinho
Opus Dei loves to chant, “You are free!” but the organization does not operate in a manner that enables you to exercise your God-given freedom properly or fully, e.g. it asks you to commit yourself to the organization without adequately attending to the right to informed consent, violating a fundamental human right.
ReplyDeleteGonzalinho